29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for WTC Demolition
June 20th, 2009 Posted in NIST, RICHARD GAGE, STEVEN JONES, STJ MEMBERS, TWIN TOWERS, WTC 7To see them, see who they are, and hear their words, is direct evidence of what many have pointed out over the years — those in the “engineering community” have often not read the official reports and have typically not even seen the videos of events like the destruction of Building 7 since that Tuesday in 2001. This was made clear during interviews with attendees at the 2009 National AIA Convention who often expressed surprise at the videos of the destruction events of the WTC, which they were completely unaware of.
And, like almost everyone else, the engineering community around the world has put their faith in the officials of the NIST and FEMA to have actually explained what happened. As it turns out, engineers are not unlike everyone else — if the officials reports are wrong, it’s easier to just try to ignore such information because to acknowledge it can instill feelings of confusion, guilt and even horror.
Jun 17, 2009
29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11
— Gregg Roberts and StaffMore than 700 architects and engineers have joined call for new investigation, faulting official collapse reports
The facts are in. The evidence is conclusive. These experts lay it all out.
For Some, the Doubts Began Early
“Something is wrong with this picture,” thought Nathan Lomba, as he watched replays of the Twin Tower collapses on television on September 11, 2001. A licensed structural engineer trained in buildings’ responses to stress, Lomba saw more on the screen than you or I. He puzzled, “How did the structures collapse in near-symmetrical fashion when the damage was clearly not symmetrical?”
CONTINUED HERE
