Two new papers just out

January 1st, 2012 Posted in

A new paper has been published by John Wyndham in the Journal of 9/11 Studies:

The Pentagon Attack: Problems with Theories Alternative to Large Plane Impact

“The widespread belief among those who question the official account of 9/11, that a large plane did not hit the Pentagon on 9/11, is unsupported by the evidence. The failure of the 9/11 truth movement to reach consensus on this issue after almost a decade is largely due to a failure to rigorously apply the scientific method to each proposed theory. This paper, by so applying the evidence to each proposed theory, shows that a large plane hitting the Pentagon is by far the most plausible theory.”

Additionally, Kevin Ryan has also published a new paper:

The Small World of 9/11 Players: LS2, Vidient and AMEC

“A simple review of the people whose roles were critical to the success of the attacks, and their associations before and after 9/11, brings to light surprising connections between companies that were responsible for security and construction, and the people most responsible for protecting the nation.”

Post a Comment